The Zero-Sum “Progressive” Left

Tags

, ,

Image

Welcome to the Paradise of the Real, by Kevin Williamson, offers a few simple thought experiments to demonstrate some economic fallacies to which progressives desperately cling. Putting such fallacies into action as policies often inures to the detriment of the presumed beneficiaries. Williamson does a nice job of covering the huge contributions of capitalism to human well-being. He also contrasts the “money” and the physical economies, and while I agree with many of his points, he seems confused about how to use the parlance of economics in this context. And he emphasizes differences in the economic philosophies of conservatives and progressives without recognizing that the intellectual development of noninterventionist governing philosophy owes a great deal to libertarians and very little to conservatives. Nevertheless, I enjoyed this essay. Here is a brief excerpt:

“Measured by practically any physical metric, from the quality of the food we eat to the health care we receive to the cars we drive and the houses we live in, Americans are not only wildly rich, but radically richer than we were 30 years ago, to say nothing of 50 or 75 years ago. And so is much of the rest of the world. That such progress is largely invisible to us is part of the genius of capitalism….”

Such a Smart Big Little Kitty Cat!

Tags

,

Image

Cats are very uncooperative subjects for behavioral research. Some interesting if sparse evidence is discussed in What Are Cats Thinking? Cats have performed as well as dogs on the “pointing test,” which demonstrates “an ability to understand what another animal is thinking.” I’ve had some pretty smart cats over the years, but it’s hard to appreciate a cat’s mind without living with it. My cat Diego is very sociable and he often tries to initiate games with me. Among other signs, he gives me an upward jerk of his head, as if to say, “Come on, gimme your best shot!” Still, as the article notes, there is no denying that cats are often simply “surfing other channels….”

House of Nudge

Tags

, , ,

Image

We can be thankful for The Limits of Social Engineering. The world would be a drab place if extensive data collection, or “reality mining,” was used to “optimize society,” continuously tracking our actions and manipulating our decisions. This is to say nothing about its real feasibility, but if it were feasible on the scale imagined by advocates, “social control” would be a more apt description.

I know first-hand that data and computing power can improve many processes. However, social-engineering fanatics promote far-reaching and intrusive use of such technologies. They seem to lack an appreciation for the efficiency, flexibility, diversity of experience, and personal freedom made possible by voluntary social cooperation through markets. More than anything else, “big data” social engineering is all too compatible with statism. It is a prescription for stasis and ultimately a pathway to a less affluent society. My favorite quote from the article: a data-driven society would “encourage us to optimize the status quo rather than challenge it.” Uh-huh…

Earth Day Doom — It’s a Tradition!

Tags

,

Image

Mark Perry: 18 spectacularly wrong apocalyptic predictions made around the time of the first Earth Day in 1970, expect more this year. But doom sells books and creates jobs for intrusive bureaucrats; it hastens the parting of earthlings from their resources in countless ways.  

Perry quotes Ronald Bailey’s prediction for Earth Day 60 in 2030: “… a much cleaner, and much richer future world, with less hunger and malnutrition, less poverty, and longer life expectancy, and with lower mineral and metal prices. But [Bailey] makes one final prediction: ‘There will be a disproportionately influential group of doomsters predicting that the future–and the present–never looked so bleak.’ In other words, the hysteria and apocalyptic predictions will continue, promoted by the ‘environmental grievance hustlers.’”

Piketty’s Bad Trip On Capitalism

Tags

, ,

Image

Clive Crook on Thomas Piketty’s much-acclaimed “Capital in the Twenty-First Century”: The Most Important Book Ever Is All Wrong. I believe the first part of that statement is intended as sarcasm, though Crook admits it’s an important book. It’s been called a Das Kapital for the 21st century. Tyler Cowen also has a review, which he summarizes here.

Piketty’s major thrust is that the return on capital will exceed economic growth in the future, leading to an ever-rising stock of capital and an ever-more-unequal distribution of income. A problem in his analysis (aside from the fact that the data he presents don’t always support his conclusions) apparently stems from a failure to account for wage dynamics: capital deepening increases wage growth. And capital deepening can be expected to lead to diminishing returns on capital. But never mind all that! Piketty says the return on capital will remain well in excess of growth, the capital stock will keep growing inexorably, and capitalists will earn increasing rents while wage income stagnates.

Crook concludes: “Over the course of history, capital accumulation has yielded growth in living standards that people in earlier centuries could not have imagined, let alone predicted — and it wasn’t just the owners of capital who benefited. Future capital accumulation may or may not increase the capital share of output; it may or may not widen inequality. … But even if it does, it won’t matter as much as whether and how quickly wages and living standards rise. That is, or ought to be, the defining issue of our era, and it’s one on which ‘Capital in the 21st Century’ has almost nothing to say.”

Spreading Fresh Manure

Tags

Image

Tyranny of the Organic Mommy Mafia is funny and rings so true, but it’s not just mommies preaching the organic religion. Many other “concerned,” self-styled nutritionists are pushing the propaganda. Not to mention the food industry, which quite rightly sees “organics” as a means to higher margins. Wash your produce (including, and maybe especially, your organic produce), keep your chicken drippings under control, cook the meat, and stop worrying!

Aside

Harvard Falls For It

Tags

,

image

Here’s a truth: building a “consensus” is seldom real science, it’s politics. For proof that politics is at the center of climate alarmism, look no further than the dishonesty with which the alarmists have conducted their campaign to promote anthropomorphic global warming, the shrill panic they seek to encourage, the demonization of skeptics, the politicization of a wide range of otherwise private decisions, and the attempt to brainwash the public via sensation-seeking media and a gullible educational establishment.

“Perhaps eons hence someone picking through the rocks in what once was Cambridge will find fossils of delicate imprint showing that intelligent life once lived until it was lost in a mass extinction brought on by ‘consensus.'”

Liberalism vs. “Progressivism”

Tags

Image

Here is “a statement of no surrender on the use of the word ‘liberal'”: Liberalism Unrelinquished. If you agree and you meet the qualifications, sign the statement. It’s astonishing that modern progressives think that granting ever greater power to government is “liberal.” It demonstrates a complete misunderstanding of the word, and of the dangers inherent in the democratic process, which were well recognized by the founders of our republic.

I’m not being defensive! You’re the one who’s being defensive!

Tags

, ,

 

Image

As if the new ACA enrollment numbers can be taken at face value, Obama tells Obamacare critics to Just shut up! James Taranto: “He says ‘we need to move on,’ and two sentences later calls for a forceful defense, before saying that ‘I don’t think we should be defensive about it,’ which reminds us of Martin Short as Nathan Thurm: ‘I’m not being defensive! You’re the one who’s being defensive! Why is it always the other person who’s being defensive? Have you ever asked yourself that? Why don’t you ask yourself that?'”

Deepening Obamacare Deficits

Tags

, ,

Image

The Unfolding Fiscal Disaster Behind ACA Enrollment Figures discusses the administration’s systematic dismantling of Obamacare’s sources of funding / savings. Not that it was well-conceived to begin with, but the objective during the law’s seat-of-the-pants implementation seems to have been to get people on the exchanges, and dependent, with a minimum of political damage. Success on either of those counts is debatable. In seeking to minimize political damage, the administration has chosen a path with dire fiscal consequences.